How We Evaluate & Score Accounting Software

By Phil · Last updated:

Our Approach

Every tool on The Phil Collective is scored using a weighted algorithm across 5 dimensions. Scores are computed from verified data — not opinions, not vendor claims. We re-verify pricing and features every 7 days. As a former government performance auditor who worked under GAGAS standards, I apply the same rigor to evaluating financial software that I once applied to auditing government programs.

Scoring Dimensions

Dimension Weight What We Measure
Features 30% Double-entry accounting, bank reconciliation, invoicing, payroll integration, multi-currency, inventory, audit trail. core accounting capabilities per plan tier
Pricing 25% Cost per user/month, plan flexibility, hidden fees, annual vs monthly savings, free tier availability
Ease of Use 20% User review scores for usability, onboarding time, learning curve, accountant-friendliness
Integrations 15% Bank feeds, payment processors, payroll systems, tax software, CRM, e-commerce, API availability
Customer Support 10% Support channels, response times, user satisfaction ratings, availability of accountant/bookkeeper access

Data Sources

We aggregate data from multiple sources to reduce bias:

Database Stats

MetricCount
Tools tracked18
Pricing plans50
Feature data points396
Head-to-head comparisons42
Price changes tracked27

What We Don't Do

Confidence Scores

Every data point in our database has a confidence score (0.0 to 1.0):

Questions about our methodology? See our analyst profile or reach out via the contact info in the footer.